Last active 9 hours ago

  1. yesterday
    Fri Jun 24 06:50:50 2022

    @TimmyBoyT It's a mod though? That's not vanilla.

    Client mods are allowed to be used by players if they get approved by the staff. This thread is a request for the staff to approve this mod for use on clients.

  2. Fri Jun 24 06:20:09 2022
    jarcl_ started the conversation New mod approval request: No Chat Reports.


    This client-side mod strips the necessary metadata from chat messages that allows Microsoft to link your Minecraft account's chat activity to your Microsoft account, meaning that players can not report you using Microsoft's report system. It works for both Forge and Fabric.

    Why is this necessary?

    Microsoft recently implemented a global ban system that works on the Microsoft account level (see: https://help.minecraft.net/hc/en-us/articles/7149823936781)

    In theory, this would allow people to report someone for misconduct on another server and prevent them from acting up on other servers.

    Sounds good, right? The issue with this is that this system is designed terribly. There are several exploiters that are now presently abusing the system to permanently ban entire servers worth of players. If you get your Microsoft account banned, your access to online servers is completely revoked:


    This mod's purpose is to disassociate the messages you send from your Microsoft account, thereby protecting you from any possible ban exploit or other such abuse.


    This mod only works if CraftyMynes sets enforce-secure-profile to false. If this is otherwise set to true, the server enforces the cryptographic metadata that the Minecraft client sends, which means that any person logged in would be presently vulnerable to the mass ban exploit.

    This chat ban system isn't even necessary for CraftyMynes anyways. The staff handles chat infractions and bans accordingly; there is no need to add an extra abusable layer on top of it. So, I suggest that enforce-secure-profile also be set to false.

  3. 3 days ago
    Tue Jun 21 19:20:12 2022
    jarcl_ posted in Server Rule Question.

    Benjamin does a little trolling


  4. Tue Jun 21 18:37:55 2022
    jarcl_ posted in Server Rule Question.

    Last time I had to move a huge base I was told that the daily limit of items I could transfer to my new base was 8 stacks iron, 1 stack of diamonds, and 9 netherite ingots. If I wanted to exceed this amount I had to pay a progressive tax that begins at 11% of the excess amount. The tax starts to increase if you exceeded at least 9 taxable stacks of iron and diamonds, and 1 ningot, with 5% per extra unit. For example if I had to move 17 stacks of iron, this is 9 stacks over the limit of 8 so I had to pay a 11% tax on the 9 stacks, which comes out to 1 stack of iron...

    If you think this is ridiculous, EVEN WITH the extremely high firework prices that's being caused by our staff, then you're right, it absolutely is ridiculous. I tried to evade this tax BS by secretly transferring my iron over, but apparently the staff can track this because a few days later I got heckled at my new base by helpers wearing black suits. They kept telling me that they were there to "audit my base." Then they kept reminding me that I owed the server 10 dubs of iron, 12 stacks of diamonds and 20 netherite blocks, and there would be dire consequences if I don't pay soon. Next time I need to put my wealth in different untrackable bases.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Tue Jun 7 17:35:18 2022
    jarcl_ posted in Something Is In The Works....

    @DystopiaUnbound_ No its actually a hole on the server known as CraftyMynes

    It was clearly a megaproject in Boston that rerouted the Central Artery of Interstate 93 (I-93), the chief highway through the heart of the city, into the 1.5-mile (2.4 km) tunnel named the Thomas P. O'Neill Jr. Tunnel. The project also included the construction of the Ted Williams Tunnel (extending I-90 to Logan International Airport), the Leonard P. Zakim Bunker Hill Memorial Bridge over the Charles River, and the Rose Kennedy Greenway in the space vacated by the previous I-93 elevated roadway. Initially, the plan was also to include a rail connection between Boston's two major train terminals. Planning began in 1982; the construction work was carried out between 1991 and 2006; and the project concluded on December 31, 2007, when the partnership between the program manager and the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority ended.[1]

  6. Tue Jun 7 16:17:49 2022
    jarcl_ posted in Simulation distance.

    dont reverse image search me creep

  7. Tue Jun 7 03:13:37 2022
    jarcl_ posted in Simulation distance.

    @ThePhoenix Ill sell 1 stack of GP for 2 stacks of dirt!

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Fri Jun 3 18:50:39 2022
    jarcl_ posted in Simulation distance.

    @iwarriiori Just buy GP, it’s super cheap.

    WoW 1 sTaCk FoR 2 DiAs ThAt Is SuCh A ScAm I sElL aT 1000 StAcKs PeR dIrT

  9. 6 weeks ago
    Wed May 11 02:41:36 2022
    jarcl_ posted in I am blocked.


  10. 3 months ago
    Mon Mar 21 00:12:41 2022
    jarcl_ posted in New Word Association.


View more