r4iscool1

Last active [hidden]

  1. 8 years ago
    Sun Oct 9 20:47:15 2016
    r4iscool1 posted in Caravan parking.

    @thegoldsmith doent have to be hundreds could be limited to about 10 1 llama units and people could trade higher quality llamas

    Then how do we decide who gets what and prevent people from hogging them ?

  2. Sun Oct 9 18:04:24 2016
    r4iscool1 posted in Caravan parking.

    We don't have enough room for hundreds of llama parking docks nor the time required to moderate said docks.
    That's aside from the whole entities in spawn issue.

    It's a pretty unrealistic idea and there no real benefit to implementing it either given that people can just TP home.

  3. Sat Oct 8 21:39:34 2016
    r4iscool1 posted in More server commands.

    @owencreeps why cant you make your house nearer to spawn instead of the outer ring

    Becuase the closer it is to spawn, the more likely it is to be raided.

  4. Sat Oct 8 19:03:25 2016

    @Cileklim @Sofatroll , @OmegaSniper4eva , @OtherGreenGamer , and?

    This, is the majority of people?

    I'm afraid what you said cannot be proven until someone shows proof, the stats that confirm the effectiveness of this method.

    Dozens of players are getting banned every week and you officially give them another chance to do the same mistakes again, for the sake of 3-5 players.

    No offense but in my opinion, it's not worth it. Just my two cents though.

    Those are far from the only players.
    In fact you won't hear about the majority of them since they choose not to advertise it and they have a right to that privacy.
    You have no right to the stats of the method and we have no obligation to prove anything to you especially when it compromises the rights of other players.

    You also radically overestimate the amount of people that return at all. The vast majority do not, since they just move on and hack elsewhere, the hardcore hackers that you are trying to defend against usually just load up another alt and get started again.

    They come back regardless of whether or not we tell them they can, so we may as well get the benefit of allowing the good players back.

    Your opinion is noted but staff which have a much better of view of what is going on in this case disagree.

  5. Sat Oct 8 14:56:12 2016

    @Cileklim Well said!

    That doesn't really seem like an improvement to me.
    At craftymynes we want to encourage people to reform when possible and become active members of our community. There is no mixed message there, we would be happy to have any good players back if they made a single slip up.
    The kind of people with malicious intent towards our server already know they can rejoin on an alt for the most part. What we are doing by this message is giving people who seem to be legitimately apologising a second chance of sorts. Sometimes this doesn't work and we curse the rule but the success stories are far to prominent to deny and the benefit the community gains is far greater than the extra time we invest on the occasion they hack.

    The majority of people you are blocking with something like this are legit players.
    Staff have seen from our position that the benefits of doing this far outweigh the risks.

  6. Sat Oct 8 02:30:26 2016

    @ZenithW I personally think that X-ray-ers should be considered as ip-banned, especially if they were caught raiding with x-ray. What if they x-ray with alt and raid with their main? Possibly even post the coords they find? It's just unfair to loyal players that spend so much time in their builds and vaults. However, i wonder if anyone ever thought about this seriously

    This just doesn't make any sense.
    How does x-raying on an alt and then raiding with a main provide any benefit over straight up x-raying...

    It's just a silly proposition to be honest and you need to go into more detail as to exactly what you are referring to.

  7. Wed Oct 5 13:37:21 2016

    @ViciousKangaroo Proxeria obvs

    Believe what you wish.

  8. Mon Oct 3 23:15:30 2016
    r4iscool1 posted in Attention.

    @ZenithW i always think X-ray should be perm ip banned. what if they X-ray with alt and raid with main?

    We know all the alts, I'm not even exaggerating when I say this.
    When an Xrayer is caught, staff generally clear the base to prevent xray items from further contaminating the market.
    The idea of xraying on an alt then raiding on a main is kind of silly by the way, there's no real benefits to using two accounts, it isn't going to stop us drawing the link between the two.

    The reasoning behind allowing the return on alts is that, you are much more invested in the server if you buy/use the alt this way and less likely to hack again. Of course this isn't always the case and sometimes staff curse this rule as it provides extra work but I think the benefits outweigh the negatives, there's plenty of successful cases even one on the staff team.

  9. Mon Oct 3 17:25:18 2016
    r4iscool1 posted in For 2Chill.

    @misterkickman No, I meant using a couple hundred votes for a very underpowered spawn egg (chicken, silverfish, bat. Etc. ) just for fun :)

    You seem very over obsessed with the idea of spawn eggs.
    If we were to implement more voting rewards, I can't see any reason to hand out eggs which have dubious EULA implications over things like decorations or heads.

  10. Mon Oct 3 15:43:00 2016
    r4iscool1 posted in Zombie Villager Spawner.

    With regards to villager eggs and zombie villager eggs.
    It was decided after 1.8 that they would no longer be released.

View more