Humfry, I know you as an amazing person that is chill and builds epic shit

not as the ricegum of craftymynes

@SharpSerac <3 that is so tru and hilarious at the same time xD

well it's hard to be a man of your word when you have two statements that contradict themselves and you have to choose one

m8, you just told us to vote and the majority voted for now, now you tellin' us to wait ;-;
that really sounds like you don't have any proof and you tryin to stress someone to confess using fake threats, if he didn't confess after all this time already and continued to do this for such a long time he probably wont confess

@HaloNest I took a java course to do some application developing n shit, I don't like it :/

Of course fuckin now!
who do you think will say give him 24 hours, also im pretty sure the leaker saw your post already and had the time to confess, excluding of course every other time before the post when he had the opportunity to come on his own

@SharpSerac Now since you like coding imma do a lil somthing for you to explain you how I see the situation in C++, here goes:

I think the question doesn't go like this

void humfrys_post (threat) //random function indicating his post and how it will go
{
for (int time = 0; time <= 24; time++)
if (leaker.confessed == true)
return;
else
forum.post(craftymynes, humfrydog, proof);
}

but rather like this

int main (situation) //the whole situation in general
{
if (leaker.confessed == true || humfry.postsToRevealLeaker != null)
std::cout << "We got a leaker :D" << std::endl;
else
std::cout << "Humfry is a player that can't really be trusted with his statements :/" << std::endl;
return 0;
}

Holy shit mate that sounds like something from the hunger games, nice post, we haven't had any real interesting stuff like this in a long time :)

buyin it

Phase