@NutjobBob Just because there's no light it doesn't mean the molecules disappear. Things don't stop existing because you can't see them...or do they... (something something matrix cat something something) .

Yeah, I picked up on that a about ten minutes ago xD

However, if we take the line as simply a perceived line, such as the results already suggested (As if we're dealing with a singular grouping of molecules that we are trying to make longer without altering them, it's impossible.), Thus, in a room without lighting, the perceived line disappears and to a viewer it would appear that the line doesn't exists, an extension of this of course is that the line becomes all consuming due to the lack of lighting itself.

@QuietSheep Sweet next one XD

========================
You draw a line, without altering the line at all, how do you make it longer?

Well, If we take the line as a collection of molecules that simply absorb more light than the rest of the paper then that is our hypothetical line. What you do then is take the piece of paper, with said line and put it in an room that allows no light to enter it. As there would no longer be any light to create the line, it becomes both infinite and non existent at the same time without actually altering the line.

Danny, Someone called Lem0nshark is now on the server.
(Thats one of them gone then)

26

27

30

30

97

113

140

135