@NutjobBob Ayy nice :)

That's the one I posted about yesterday in the mansion thread. If you read the comments someone gives a fix Crafty could implement to make the mansions generate again. I'm hoping he saw it in the other thread :)

oh i see, hm interesting .

Hello let's walk through this here together .

[17:03:20] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> u got kicked for saying a word?
[17:03:31] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> thats bullshit
[17:03:44] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> although its kick
[17:03:45] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> ed
[17:03:47] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <nobodywasishere> I got kicked for saying I dont like trump
[17:03:49] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> i get kicked all the time
[17:03:54] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <_TheWhale_> Why though
[17:03:58] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <_TheWhale_> We're not hurting anyone
[17:03:58] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> idk
[17:04:01] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> all these people
[17:04:05] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> are super butthurt

We have rules for a reason, they aren't because anyone is "super butthurt" they are in place to protect the community from arguments in chat, people being overly offensive, and to protect the younger players of the community, as just a few examples.

[17:19:08] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> speaking of assasination
[17:19:08] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <Moppeh_> Are laws within the politics section?
[17:19:08] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <§2acraft222§r> lol
[17:19:14] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> trump should be assasinated-some fuckin asshole

politics ...

[17:19:30] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> like hitler should be off limits
[17:19:33] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> i get that

politics

[17:19:47] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> i got a warning for language"
[17:19:55] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> for saying hitler

So you got a warning so you say it again...

[17:20:07] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <§9Tezzer§r> lets not talk about it
[17:20:07] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <§f2Chill§r> ryan didnt u just get unbanned
[17:20:07] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> its 626
[17:20:08] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <§f2Chill§r> recently ...
[17:20:10] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> ya
[17:20:15] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <§f2Chill§r> you are about to end up making another appeal

here reminding you that you just got recently got unbanned....

[17:20:16] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> i got banned for a stupid reason too

which you think was a stupid reason further appearing to disagree with the rules ..

[17:20:43] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] * ryanman2000 dabs
[17:20:50] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] * ryanman2000 dab
[17:20:50] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] ryanman2000 left the game
[17:20:54] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] ryanman2000 joined the game

server kicked you for spam here ..

[17:20:59] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> O WOW I WAS KICKED

then you came back with all caps... you were kicked

[17:21:32] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <§f2Chill§r> ryanman2000 play the game stop the trolling please.
[17:21:38] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> what trolling
[17:21:44] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> u dont even know what that means
[17:22:16] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] <ryanman2000> kys 2notchill

So no this not a joke in anyway shape or form , this is you breaking the rules multiple times, being reminded that you were just unbanned in the last couple days for breaking the chat rules, including politics in chat , yet you don't seem to care to be honest , you were given many chances as you can see from the chat logs , yet continue to carry on breaking rules , so considering you were just recently unbanned for some of the exact same reason's and after a brief discussion with a few other staff members, a 5 day ban is in order , hopefully after this you will follow the rules and make sure to familiarize yourself with them , so we don't have to see you back making another appeal in the future .

Be respectful to other players - Don’t use extremely derogatory terms or epithets. Don’t insult or personally attack others in excess. If someone asks you to stop, then stop.

Practice good chat etiquette - Don’t use caps, don’t spam, don’t discuss controversial, sensitive or offensive topics (e.g. sex, sexual identity or preferences, race, politics, religion, drugs, etc.), no advertising, no links, no trolling. Please only use the minecraft font and English in global chat

Please listen to staff members - In order to keep the server safe, staff reserve the right to add, modify and patch rules.

@NutjobBob If you want these bugs fixed please please make an account on the bug tracker and upvote the issues so they get the attention they need.
I often respond to threads complaining about bugs with links to the relevant bug on the bug tracker, All too often I get the feeling that these go ignored because people can't be bothered to follow the link. If you want bugs to be fixed you need to bring them to the attention of the developers, whining on the forum of a single Minecraft server accomplishes very little.

yes of course , i didn't even realize it was a issue , as this is the first i have actually seen about it ,i have no experience with the mansion issue but as far as end cities goes i don't see what it has really hurt its usually 1 or 2 broken chest but all the items are still there and can easily be picked up, everything seems to spawn in fine besides a chest or two randomly , ethier way its not the way it was intended to be so i upvoted it , the mansion issues people have stated seem to be worse than the end ones , also i was told by someone else the end city chest problem has been ongoing since before 1.12 so idk .

p.s. upvote this one also as it seems to directly respond to the mansion and end issue .

https://bugs.mojang.com/browse/MC-96998

just to show i voted ;]

@R4iscool1 Ultimately it's harmful and unfair to just reset for the sake of a small number of users who wish to explore temples and mansions. Especially since the problem would reoccur in a couple of months again, a small minority should not dictate the servers direction I'm.
The majority of players want to keep their builds and should be allowed too, unless there is serious reasons we need to reset.

@R4iscool1 I think reducing the size would be a bad idea, craftymynes is not a solely grief/raid server, plenty of players in fact I'd say most of the regular playerbase just want to build and be part of the community, decreasing the size of the map which makes it harder to do so would he a bad idea. Sure Map size would be reduced but it wouldn't have an affect on lag anymore than there is less chunks being generated.

Doing the maths as well would show that players would constantly be running into each other at 30k, consider the average player Base which can be said to encompass 100 square blocks though many far exceed that, within a 90k area there can only be 450 of the 200 block squared patches for building. That's less than our player Base.

I don't see ant reason to sacrifice some of the community nature to make it more risky and therefore more fun to a small minority of the playerbase.

Question , where is the numbers to go with those two statements, while i do agree it is most likely true , those two statements about small minority and the majority i just don't see where you are getting your census from or what not , but i am interested to see , as staff its easy for us to say most want this most dont want this etc etc , who did you ask exactly , and also as you said on someones thread before , you can't go by a few post on the forums ... i assume you still stand by that , so but on some of the other points you made i can see the risk you referred to change sometimes can be scary and i don't expect the size to change at all , but it's always nice to play devil's advocate to get the ball rolling and just see what people actually think , i don't think with 50k by 50k it would be that hard to hide lol ...i have had lots of bases at 40k - or 50k as i played a very very very lot , and they havent been raided , unless you count that one incident with artemis(he got banned and leaked our cords ) , i think there is something to be said for more player interaction and it would spice things up a bit , but as we both know we are just speaking thoughts or oppions i guess , people do join knowing its a raid and grief server , but i agree anything under 50k would be unfair to those "strictly builders " .

@R4iscool1 Interesting so it seems there is a whole host of issues with generation at the moment, I assumed that it was one bug that only affect Mansions. Rather disappointing but not surprising coming from Mojang.
It definitely makes it rather pointless to reset if we will be beset by the exact same bugs.

Agreed i have found end citys also with chest already broken and the items laying on the floor where the chest should be as i saw someone else mention but i don't see how reseting as you said is going to help anything considering ongoing mojang bugs.

@CraftyMyner A progressive increase is world size would probably piss people off

@CraftyMyner

You did not address any of this , how about a decrease , next time a reset rolls around , might be a nice change and worth a try

"Hm , for a player base the size as craftymynes i think 25-30k would be better than 6k or 1k , people could still build then but with more risk and more chance for the pvpers and griefers .
Also , i think with a smaller world , technically wouldn't that mean less lag also , or would it not matter does it only consider loaded chunks ? i am guessing not since it still seems to be able to count all enitys even if not loaded , i.e squids etc ?"

anything under 50k or below would be interesting change

@SharpSerac i'd prefer the map to be 1k by 1k, world border at 500 xd

@javonjw @SharpSerac 6k is not to bad lol

Hm , for a player base the size as craftymynes i think 25-30k would be better than 6k or 1k , people could still build then but with more risk and more chance for the pvpers and griefers .
Also , i think with a smaller world , technically wouldn't that mean less lag also , or would it not matter does it only consider loaded chunks ? i am guessing not since it still seems to be able to count all enitys even if not loaded , i.e squids etc ?
@CraftyMyner

@The3xpertGamer but i like to log

o.o

Hello , Thanks for the honesty but hacking or cheating in anyway is not allowed ,appeal denied best of luck elsewhere.

Congrats to ButterChully !

Cords were 6515 12 -7979

Updated x+z again , Both cords are within this range.

x and z cords: somewhere between 6,400 and 8,200 ( x and z cords can be negative or positive or positive negative)